251
251
Nov 16, 2012
11/12
by
FBC
tv
eye 251
favorite 0
quote 0
susan rice is another one. hillary clinton is another. we would not be doing are due diligence as investigators if we did not question the office. if the president thinks we're being unfair to susan rice, he can comment. that is always an option, too. if he wants to be sent for my millions towards her company can come to congressman to the questions. lou: i'm going to be asking a number of people throughout this question, but under feinstein, her committee did not want to comment. i want to does ask you quickly wrap up here. for your viewers, is whether or not there is any grounds for not commenting on what seems to be a matter of fact issue. she was asked whether the cia operatives in benghazi, what about them calling for help? and can you think of any reason why that would not be a matter that could be shed with shared with the american public? >> no, sir, i cannot. lou: and what about the administration's original versions of events? your reaction? >> there's a difference of not wanting comment on something and not being able to. it is
susan rice is another one. hillary clinton is another. we would not be doing are due diligence as investigators if we did not question the office. if the president thinks we're being unfair to susan rice, he can comment. that is always an option, too. if he wants to be sent for my millions towards her company can come to congressman to the questions. lou: i'm going to be asking a number of people throughout this question, but under feinstein, her committee did not want to comment. i want to...
186
186
Nov 15, 2012
11/12
by
FBC
tv
eye 186
favorite 0
quote 0
but -- what better way than to send out susan rice who knows nothing? she can't possibly make a mistake. she can't possibly reveal information inadvertently? think of the risk of putting hillary clinton out there who actually knew what happened. lou: that raises the question, where was the secretary of state? where was the head of the national security council? where was the national security adviser? where was david petraeus for crying out loud? >> you know, what general petraeus would say in congress is going to be very important because there is one major question, a lot of the answers of your not kidding, what was the assessment of the obama administration of the area where there consular was? there's a big difference. if this was an area as secure as iceland or waziristan. time confident that there were cables that said there are ten training centers for militias around that location. so i would like to know if the administration basically perceived the location is dangerous there for what were the measures and therefore when the attack occurred, t
but -- what better way than to send out susan rice who knows nothing? she can't possibly make a mistake. she can't possibly reveal information inadvertently? think of the risk of putting hillary clinton out there who actually knew what happened. lou: that raises the question, where was the secretary of state? where was the head of the national security council? where was the national security adviser? where was david petraeus for crying out loud? >> you know, what general petraeus would...
170
170
Oct 22, 2012
10/12
by
FBC
tv
eye 170
favorite 0
quote 0
unnamed officials and ambassador susan rice blaming the intelligence community about public response from intelligence officials even though the state department has testified before congress they were watching the benghazi events unfold in "real-time." and david axelrod still went on national television yesterday telllng the american people this. >> investigation ongoing with the intelligence community, the fbi on the ground, and we have reported the administration has reported everything that we have been told, and we shared it in real-time. there has been no inconsistency, only reports on the data and the intelligence we have been given. lou: that is what david axelrod said after weeks of claiming they can't answer questions because of the fbi investigation. the president's top campaign advisor calls on national television thursda as they repod everything they've been told. statements like that aren't likely to slow governor romney's momentum. national polls show him searching. we take all of that up here tonight and what we can expect in the final presidential debate talking with
unnamed officials and ambassador susan rice blaming the intelligence community about public response from intelligence officials even though the state department has testified before congress they were watching the benghazi events unfold in "real-time." and david axelrod still went on national television yesterday telllng the american people this. >> investigation ongoing with the intelligence community, the fbi on the ground, and we have reported the administration has reported...
136
136
Nov 17, 2012
11/12
by
FBC
tv
eye 136
favorite 0
quote 0
as for benghazi and susan rice, i think that this is worse than watergate. if the president does double down it will backfire on him. lou: the last word. >> the only has so much political capital to spend. he spends it all once is a rise, which i think is a fool's errand because we don't know where this is going. we do know that their have to be other hearings. could not end today please today was a very bad day for him on this. lou: as we watch all this one can begin to understand his error in senate. he, david axelrod, his reelection campaign, his administration, they have successfully fended off an inquiry from the republicans, the national media, won reelection, and they look like they are one heck of a lot smarter than the republicans. thank you very much. appreciated. good to see you. lou: that petraeus sex scandal. without it would we have never learned more about a dozen? and paul was going to the mind of our nation's top spy . here to a psychoanalyze the pair. richard trumka does not have much to say about the union that brought down hostess. instea
as for benghazi and susan rice, i think that this is worse than watergate. if the president does double down it will backfire on him. lou: the last word. >> the only has so much political capital to spend. he spends it all once is a rise, which i think is a fool's errand because we don't know where this is going. we do know that their have to be other hearings. could not end today please today was a very bad day for him on this. lou: as we watch all this one can begin to understand his...